Timeline for Photographic techniques to avoid chromatic aberration?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 8, 2016 at 10:53 | comment | added | HamishKL | "Would stop down the aperture help?" Yes, for the reason that you mention. Also nobody has mentioned ensuring your lens is clean; significant smudges on your front element can diffuse light entering the lens, thereby decreasing contrast and apparently worsening CA in some situations. | |
| Apr 7, 2016 at 16:05 | answer | added | inkista | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 7, 2016 at 2:14 | answer | added | Parham P Baker | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 6, 2013 at 22:33 | answer | added | feklee | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 6, 2013 at 21:46 | answer | added | David Braun | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 10:15 | answer | added | Matt Grum | timeline score: 8 | |
| S Mar 9, 2011 at 9:09 | history | post merged (destination) | |||
| Mar 9, 2011 at 1:50 | comment | added | JoséNunoFerreira | My concern about this approach: i think it only corrects for lateral color fringing, something that is subject independent, and lens specific. it's great, and i agree, recent nikons (gen 2 cameras, according to ken rockwell) do this, as well as probably all raw developing software. However, for particular high contrast subjects, i am not sure it works! (sorry about quoting controversial people like mr rockwell) | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 1:36 | vote | accept | JoséNunoFerreira | ||
| Mar 9, 2011 at 1:36 | comment | added | JoséNunoFerreira | @mattdm & @Jay Lance Photography - its sort of a reformulation and call for specific solutions, when taking the picture. i don't really think this is noise. | |
| Mar 9, 2011 at 1:01 | comment | added | Jay Lance Photography | possible duplicate of How do I avoid getting any chromatic aberration in my photographs? | |
| Mar 8, 2011 at 23:43 | comment | added | mattdm | Wait, hold on, how is this not an exact duplicate of the question you link to? Or at least an update, asking for techniques to reduce where it can't be avoided? | |
| Mar 8, 2011 at 23:42 | comment | added | mattdm | I know you said no "fix it in post" answers, but it is worth noting that this is something which can be corrected for reasonably well in RAW processing with a lens-specific profile. Some cameras will even do this as part of their in-camera jpeg conversion. | |
| Mar 8, 2011 at 23:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/45263317312348160 | ||
| Mar 8, 2011 at 23:20 | answer | added | user2910 | timeline score: 11 | |
| Mar 8, 2011 at 23:03 | history | asked | JoséNunoFerreira | CC BY-SA 2.5 | |
| Jul 21, 2010 at 12:17 | vote | accept | Lazer | ||
| S Mar 9, 2011 at 9:09 | |||||
| Jul 15, 2010 at 20:17 | answer | added | chills42 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 20:03 | answer | added | Rezlaj | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 15, 2010 at 20:02 | answer | added | Rowland Shaw | timeline score: 1 |