Timeline for Is there an equivalent to Adobe's "Vibrance" in Gimp?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 16, 2019 at 5:44 | history | suggested | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
broken images fixed (click 'rendered output' or 'side-by-side' to see the difference); for more info, see https://gist.github.com/Glorfindel83/9d954d34385d2ac2597bbe864466259f
|
| Mar 15, 2019 at 20:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 16, 2019 at 5:44 | |||||
| Mar 6, 2011 at 5:33 | history | bounty ended | mattdm | ||
| Mar 5, 2011 at 21:12 | comment | added | mattdm | Based on this, I've added "vibrance" to my list of photography-related features missing from Gimp. I think even with your process for doing something similar, it still counts as "missing". photo.stackexchange.com/questions/556/… | |
| Mar 5, 2011 at 21:01 | comment | added | mattdm | Awesome, thanks. I can't award the bounty yet, but I'll be amazed if someone comes along and tops this. :) | |
| Mar 5, 2011 at 8:09 | history | answered | cabbey | CC BY-SA 2.5 |