Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 4, 2017 at 18:55 comment added Snippit the thread was this one: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/49181/…
Sep 4, 2017 at 18:55 comment added Snippit The thread I read was about camera body and lens, not the ability of the photographer - which obviously has a lot to do with it!
Sep 4, 2017 at 7:57 answer added Philip Kendall timeline score: 3
Sep 4, 2017 at 7:22 comment added Michael C Could you provide a link to the old thread on here that leads you to believe good photos are affected by the combination of lens and camera body rather than by the knowledge, skill, and vision of the photographer?
Sep 4, 2017 at 7:18 history edited Michael C CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 5 characters in body; edited title
Sep 3, 2017 at 17:59 comment added Snippit The Canon shots have never seemed very sharp, and the colours aren't as bright. I've never used the Canon for macro, I started macro with the Lumix. The Lumix is great, colour and sharpness, (maybe the Leica lens?) I just wanted to up my macro photography even more, but can't afford a new SLR. I could stretch to the new lens. Thanks for your input everyone!
Sep 3, 2017 at 17:45 comment added StephenG - Help Ukraine You may want to learn about depth of field. DSLRs and a bridge camera like the FZ200 have completely different sized sensor and this is a significant issue in macro photography (where depth of field is an issue).
Sep 3, 2017 at 17:29 comment added mattdm What results are you unhappy with? What are you aiming for?
Sep 3, 2017 at 17:17 comment added Philip Kendall Could you post some sample shots from your 500D, explaining what you'd like to improve about them?
Sep 3, 2017 at 17:16 review First posts
Sep 3, 2017 at 19:22
Sep 3, 2017 at 17:12 history asked Snippit CC BY-SA 3.0