Timeline for Are self-cleaning sensors now standard?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2017 at 8:09 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Aug 6, 2017 at 6:14 | comment | added | StephenG - Help Ukraine | No, I'm saying that "self cleaning" is just one level of protection from dust. It's still possible to get dust (or more persist things like pollen) on your sensor assembly that won't necessarily be removed by self cleaning. It's useful to do the standard check for dust if you have a chance. This spots problems before they turn up in shots. | |
| Aug 6, 2017 at 5:52 | comment | added | user59085 | @StephenG, I'm not sure I understand your comment. Are you saying that one should properly clean one's sensor even if it is self-cleaning? | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 22:40 | comment | added | StephenG - Help Ukraine | Please note that while there is a dust removal system in these types of cameras, that does not mean you won;t even have to remove dust. They're useful but not perfect. | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 20:31 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhotos/status/893570145498607617 | ||
| Aug 4, 2017 at 19:04 | history | edited | scottbb♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
replaced 'right single quote' with apostrophe (was causing in-word line breaking); removed [slr] tag, added [cleaning]
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 18:47 | answer | added | Itai | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 16:22 | history | asked | user59085 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |