Timeline for What is the 'Golden Ratio' and why is it better than the 'Rule of Thirds?'
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2015 at 21:15 | comment | added | szulat | the first rule of the Rule Club - you do not talk about Rules! | |
| Dec 16, 2015 at 21:12 | history | edited | mattdm |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 21, 2015 at 16:00 | comment | added | DA01 | It's not 'better'. It's just an option. Just as any arbitrary ratio is an option. | |
| Jan 19, 2015 at 14:12 | history | protected | Joanne C | ||
| Feb 3, 2014 at 11:04 | answer | added | Andre Nagel | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 22:28 | comment | added | Tom | I wished the rules was commonly called the "rule of off-center". | |
| Jul 21, 2013 at 18:17 | comment | added | Michael Nielsen | you have two questions, Ill answer teh 2nd here: it isn't | |
| Jul 21, 2013 at 16:37 | comment | added | user21187 | man you guys think it's tough applying the golden ratio to photography try it with music!! | |
| May 1, 2011 at 8:10 | history | edited | Jay Lance Photography |
Tag edit
|
|
| Feb 28, 2011 at 14:25 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 28, 2011 at 1:24 | vote | accept | Jay Lance Photography | ||
| Feb 23, 2011 at 23:21 | vote | accept | Jay Lance Photography | ||
| Feb 28, 2011 at 1:23 | |||||
| Feb 23, 2011 at 19:32 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 16 | |
| Feb 20, 2011 at 19:34 | answer | added | Andrew Stacey | timeline score: 58 | |
| Feb 19, 2011 at 2:19 | answer | added | Nick Bedford | timeline score: 24 | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 23:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/38740193620148224 | ||
| Feb 18, 2011 at 22:05 | comment | added | lindes | @decasteljau: Some guidelines are inferior to others, though your point is basically valid. @zzzzBov: Ahh, but they both are, just with different meanings of those two words ("rule" as "something regarded as a normative example"; "theory" as "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world" (both selected from a dictionary app on my phone)). And in fact Newtonian physics has been shown to be "wrong"; you get more accurate predictions with Einstein's relativity... But people still use Newton's rules because they're "close enough" in many situations and much easier to apply. | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 20:34 | comment | added | zzzzBov | Isn't it interesting how the "Rule of Thirds" and "Theory of Gravity" aren't? | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 20:12 | answer | added | jrista | timeline score: 38 | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 19:50 | comment | added | decasteljau | Don't forget: there aren't any strict rule to follow. The term "rule" in "rule of third" is so wrong. Those are guidelines, not rules. Just go as you feel is the best for you and your subject. No guideline is inferior to another. Rules are meant to be broken anyway. | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 19:15 | answer | added | Matt Grum | timeline score: 22 | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 19:09 | answer | added | cabbey | timeline score: 18 | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 18:38 | answer | added | PearsonArtPhoto | timeline score: 28 | |
| Feb 18, 2011 at 18:28 | history | asked | Jay Lance Photography | CC BY-SA 2.5 |