Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 28, 2017 at 18:16 vote accept Ryan
May 26, 2017 at 20:15 history edited Ryan CC BY-SA 3.0
added 319 characters in body
May 25, 2017 at 18:11 comment added WayneF FWIW, f/1.4 and f/1.8 are NOT portrait lenses. They are low light lenses. The commercial portrait studio could not imagine using f/1.8. Their goal is to sell the portrait, so they provide proper light, at more near f/8 for better sharpness. Portrait lenses are longer lenses, like 105 mm for full frame 35mm, or 70 mm for APS frame. The longer lens forces standing back a few feet for proper portrait perspective. The f/1.8 lens can help blur the background, but a longer lens standing back can do that better too, while still providing a better image at subject distance.
May 25, 2017 at 18:08 comment added Alaska Man Popular ? what do you mean by popular. Are you asking if more people buy lens's with a certain Maximum aperture as opposed to a different maximum aperture?
May 25, 2017 at 14:28 history tweeted twitter.com/StackPhotos/status/867749312478023680
May 25, 2017 at 11:24 answer added mattdm timeline score: 4
May 25, 2017 at 5:50 comment added Ryan @Caleb no I am asking why 2.8 and 4 is more common than say 2.2, 3.5, 4.5, 6.3 etc... Never heard of F/2.7 and 3.0. I already know that apertures come in 1/2 or 1/3 (or whatever it is) stop increments if that's what you're wondering :)
May 25, 2017 at 4:25 comment added scottbb Related: What does f-stop mean?
May 25, 2017 at 4:25 comment added scottbb Related: What is an easy way to remember the full stop scale?
May 25, 2017 at 4:24 comment added scottbb Related: Is there a sane reason why ¹⁄₁₂₅ is not, instead, exactly half of ¹⁄₆₀? (the 2nd highest rated answer touches on apertures)
May 25, 2017 at 1:48 comment added Caleb Are you asking why f/2.8 is a common aperture rather than, say, f/2.7 or f/3.0?
May 25, 2017 at 0:00 answer added meklarian timeline score: 1
May 24, 2017 at 23:59 answer added yulunz timeline score: 5
May 24, 2017 at 22:58 history asked Ryan CC BY-SA 3.0