Timeline for What would be the reason to not include VR/IS in a telephoto lens?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2017 at 17:50 | vote | accept | Arseni Mourzenko | ||
| Oct 25, 2016 at 13:00 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 31, 2016 at 3:01 | |||||
| Oct 25, 2016 at 11:45 | answer | added | null | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 11:42 | comment | added | Arseni Mourzenko | @kazanaki: so VR mechanism is that different from lens to lens? I thought VR mechanism from, say, the new 70-200mm could be reused virtually without any changes for, say, a 105mm prime. | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 11:31 | comment | added | kazanaki | Cost. You don't know the production trade-offs. Maybe adding VR to a $2.000 lens would bump up the price to $3.000. Only the companies themselves can answer your question. | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 11:28 | history | asked | Arseni Mourzenko | CC BY-SA 3.0 |