Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 8, 2016 at 6:56 history edited Qrlet CC BY-SA 3.0
added 13 characters in body
Oct 7, 2016 at 20:24 history edited Qrlet CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Oct 7, 2016 at 15:55 history edited Qrlet CC BY-SA 3.0
added 769 characters in body
Oct 7, 2016 at 15:33 vote accept Qrlet
Oct 7, 2016 at 15:33 vote accept Qrlet
Oct 7, 2016 at 15:33
Oct 4, 2016 at 16:36 answer added user50888 timeline score: 1
Oct 3, 2016 at 23:19 history edited Conor Boyd CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected typo in title
Oct 3, 2016 at 18:02 history edited MikeW CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 11 characters in body
Oct 3, 2016 at 14:32 review Close votes
Oct 12, 2016 at 3:03
Oct 3, 2016 at 14:18 comment added mattdm I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this question is about using a camera as a digital instrument, not for photography.
Oct 3, 2016 at 14:15 comment added Rafael I do not understand what do you mean by "photo precision". You need to have a scale and distortion references.
Oct 3, 2016 at 11:26 answer added null timeline score: 3
Oct 3, 2016 at 11:22 comment added Philip Kendall @CarlWitthoft I think an expanded version of that is probably what the OP is looking for as an answer to this question. People don't always know what they need to know before they ask a question :-)
Oct 3, 2016 at 11:21 comment added Carl Witthoft It doesn't work that way. You cannot calculate image resolution purely on the basis of number of pixels. As a minimum, you need to know the lens OTF, the pixel fill factor, and if not shooting RAW, the filter algorithms.
Oct 3, 2016 at 11:04 history edited null
edited tags
Oct 3, 2016 at 10:18 review First posts
Oct 3, 2016 at 17:10
Oct 3, 2016 at 10:18 history asked Qrlet CC BY-SA 3.0