Timeline for What practical advantages do expensive Nikon DSLRs give vs affordable ones?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2016 at 16:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhotos/status/769936053029462016 | ||
| Aug 28, 2016 at 12:56 | comment | added | David Richerby | The more expensive cameras are more solidly built. This could even save your life. (OK, I'm cheating a bit: that's a 1960s Nikon F and you're probably not intending to photograph the Vietnam War.) | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 23:19 | comment | added | Michael C | I've seen photos published in newspapers that I know were shot at well over ISO 6400 because a few times I've asked the person that shot them what ISO he was using when he was standing next to me shooting some of them. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 19:51 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Aug 27, 2016 at 19:41 | answer | added | bwDraco | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 18:43 | comment | added | null | "nobody really uses anything above 6400" except those that think differently about that. I might find it worth it to spend 4500$ to get a photo quality at ISO 6400 that I consider good. You might not. Quality is not a matter of black or white (pun intended) either, what applies to a certain type of photograph not necessarily applies to another. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 16:49 | answer | added | Michael C | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 16:35 | comment | added | Michael C | Megapixels aren't everything. Sometimes they're a disadvantage. | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 15:22 | vote | accept | Transcendent | ||
| Aug 27, 2016 at 15:18 | answer | added | Itai | timeline score: 14 | |
| Aug 27, 2016 at 14:44 | history | edited | Transcendent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 226 characters in body
|
| Aug 27, 2016 at 14:35 | history | asked | Transcendent | CC BY-SA 3.0 |