Timeline for Does shooting landscape at lower f-stop produce reasonably sharp images?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2016 at 12:18 | vote | accept | sherlock | ||
| Aug 12, 2016 at 18:48 | answer | added | Caleb | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 12, 2016 at 18:03 | answer | added | MirekE | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 12, 2016 at 17:10 | comment | added | Michael C | @laurencemadill On the other hand, you can stop an f/1.4 lens down two full stops and still use a shutter time half as long as with an f/4 lens used wide open. | |
| Aug 12, 2016 at 16:25 | answer | added | Alan Marcus | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 12, 2016 at 15:57 | answer | added | digijim | timeline score: -2 | |
| Aug 12, 2016 at 14:09 | answer | added | Michael C | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 12, 2016 at 13:19 | history | edited | mattdm |
edited tags
|
|
| Aug 12, 2016 at 13:12 | comment | added | laurencemadill | Remember that most wide aperture prime lenses won't perform at their best when they're at their widest aperture. Usually to get the sharpest results, you need to be at perhaps 2-3 stops smaller than the lens's widest aperture | |
| Aug 12, 2016 at 13:01 | history | asked | sherlock | CC BY-SA 3.0 |