Timeline for What's the best way to minimize wedding picture time?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2016 at 23:45 | comment | added | Russell McMahon | ... obviously that's a bit on the rough side. If they can also be polite charming smiling and winsome as well, so much the better. A cross between a Bosnian ambassador of the late 1800s and a junk yard dog ? :-). | |
| Jun 21, 2016 at 23:44 | comment | added | Russell McMahon | @The_traveler As dpollitt said, it can involve "... wrangling drunk people, shooting people of vastly different ages, and people who either have a strong desire or no desire at all to be a part of the pictures at all..." . Add coteyr's "People will be happy, sad, both, angry, drunk, snobbish, smelly, loud, timid, ... any kind of process requires the consent of the group. ... It's likely you won't even get the group to agree on what consent means." -> You need someone that's pugnacious tenacious effective and irresistable. If the correct people are in the photo and smiling you've won. ... | |
| Jun 21, 2016 at 18:01 | comment | added | The _traveler | I'm not certain about calling them 'junkyard dogs' but you must have some one (or two) people who know all the players and whose responsibility is to get them there for the images. | |
| Jun 19, 2016 at 11:50 | history | answered | Russell McMahon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |