Timeline for What are the key photography-related features from Photoshop that are missing in GIMP?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
35 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2018 at 19:47 | comment | added | mattdm | @PeterTaylor It's not that it doesn't work on the selection but that it doesn't work as a brush. | |
| Apr 27, 2018 at 19:43 | comment | added | Peter Taylor | I'm puzzled by point 4. I don't know what the "Color Exchange" dialog is in the Gimp, but all of the dialogs in the Colors menu (including Hue-Saturation, which sounds like what you describe) work on the selection - and I'm still using 2.6, whose copyright information suggests that it dates to 2008. | |
| Apr 27, 2018 at 19:29 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
2.10!
|
| Aug 25, 2017 at 13:24 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 75 characters in body
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Apr 3, 2017 at 15:20 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 854 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2017 at 17:11 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Oct 9, 2016 at 17:07 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add color replacement tool
|
| Dec 14, 2015 at 15:10 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 123 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2015 at 20:49 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 191 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2014 at 13:42 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formatting error from last edit
|
| Dec 4, 2014 at 13:57 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 867 characters in body
|
| Mar 10, 2014 at 14:07 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 150 characters in body
|
| Dec 15, 2012 at 9:08 | comment | added | unhammer | registry.gimp.org/node/107 is a color vibrance script for GIMP, I don't know how well it compares | |
| May 8, 2012 at 3:43 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
better link for adjustment layers
|
| May 7, 2012 at 19:55 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 77 characters in body
|
| Apr 18, 2012 at 21:40 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
breaking news!
|
| Mar 30, 2012 at 0:39 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1241 characters in body
|
| Mar 24, 2012 at 21:57 | history | wiki removed | rfusca | ||
| Mar 24, 2012 at 3:04 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
more on face detection; link example of adjustment layers being useful
|
| Mar 22, 2012 at 17:05 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
some cs6 updates
|
| Feb 12, 2012 at 16:32 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add high bit depth for an even ten. explain adjustment layers more since that seems to be a point of confusion. and, link the roadmap here.
|
| Aug 23, 2011 at 17:22 | comment | added | mattdm | @cabbey: see this q/a. Photoshop also has layer blend modes like those in Gimp; Adjustment Layers are a feature beyond that, so it's not accurate to say that Gimp is trying (which implies that they're not doing as well). It's simply something not implemented. | |
| Aug 23, 2011 at 16:19 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 644 characters in body
|
| Jul 6, 2011 at 4:15 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
blend modes.
|
| Jun 22, 2011 at 13:15 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 801 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2011 at 5:52 | comment | added | cabbey | Very true @mattdm. Maybe "minimal, limited, adjustment layers." instead of "No adjustment layers." since they do at least TRY. | |
| Mar 6, 2011 at 5:42 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 181 characters in body
|
| Mar 5, 2011 at 21:42 | comment | added | cabbey | it's not really fair to put the adjustment layers on there, as I showed in my vibrance answer, it does have them, they just work differently. | |
| Mar 5, 2011 at 21:08 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 569 characters in body
|
| Feb 24, 2011 at 19:44 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 423 characters in body
|
| Jan 28, 2011 at 14:56 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 387 characters in body
|
| Jan 26, 2011 at 18:55 | comment | added | mattdm | That's what I use too. It is pretty good, but I still think it's also fair to call it "rough". And it hasn't been updated in over two years. | |
| Jan 26, 2011 at 9:53 | comment | added | labnut | I find the Wavelet Denoise plugin to be pretty good. | |
| Jan 26, 2011 at 1:42 | history | answered | mattdm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |