Timeline for Why would a full frame prime lens be less effective on a Nikon d5300?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2016 at 6:47 | vote | accept | Alireza | ||
| Mar 10, 2016 at 2:27 | answer | added | Lee Saxon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 19:04 | history | edited | inkista | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Don't need to quote-as-code everything. Grammar tweaks. Capitalized model names.
|
| Mar 9, 2016 at 15:03 | answer | added | Euri Pinhollow | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 14:50 | comment | added | scottbb♦ | In that video, Tony said that the "common wisdom" that good FF lenses will perform well on crop bodies is not always true, talked about 2 anecdotes from his and a friend's experiences, then using those 2 anecdotes, generalized the opposite of the conventional wisdom. There was a lot of handwaving and zero explanation. Tony might have some good advice, but that video was 44 minutes of fluff with no meat. | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 14:44 | comment | added | Michael C | And photo.stackexchange.com/questions/25108/… | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 14:43 | comment | added | Michael C | It is not that the lens is less effective on the D5300 than on a FF camera, it's that the D5300 under certain conditions may be less effective at capturing the performance of the lens than a FF camera would be. Please see photo.stackexchange.com/questions/3370/… | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 14:39 | history | edited | scottbb♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed link to start video at discussion of issue this regarding this question
|
| Mar 9, 2016 at 13:39 | vote | accept | Alireza | ||
| Mar 10, 2016 at 6:47 | |||||
| Mar 9, 2016 at 12:57 | history | edited | Joanne C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Less shopping-like title
|
| Mar 9, 2016 at 12:29 | answer | added | Sahil | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 11:53 | history | asked | Alireza | CC BY-SA 3.0 |