Timeline for Why don't event photographers release non-touched up images?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 2, 2016 at 13:29 | comment | added | Jon Story | Also worth noting that a photographer will take a lot of pictures, and a huge number of them will be crap (people blinking, missed focus, movement, wrong exposure setting). They take the pictures and then fix the problem in the next shot: but if they gave you each exposure and you started showing them because "Oh look at Auntie Maud's hat in this one" then it damages their reputation and "brand". Video is a little different, as it's not as specific to settings in one "instant". Even so, they'll tend to edit out the initial "focus and set the exposure" which takes a few seconds | |
Feb 2, 2016 at 12:05 | comment | added | Steve Ives | That's not the point being made - the point is that the OP is happy to let the photography makes ALL those other choices, just not the one as to which photos are worth processing. If the photographer wants to use a P&S on full-auto, so be it. | |
Feb 2, 2016 at 6:52 | comment | added | DetlevCM | I don't think the first point is really valid - as long as the equipment is "good enough", the skill of the photographer is more important than the equipment. Yes, a faster prime will give better depth of field control, BUT it doens't mean you cannot shoot good images with a slower lens either. | |
Feb 1, 2016 at 20:44 | history | edited | null | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 199 characters in body
|
Feb 1, 2016 at 20:19 | history | answered | null | CC BY-SA 3.0 |