Timeline for Cross-software text description/definition of a presets and styles?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2016 at 20:48 | vote | accept | igor | ||
| Jan 19, 2016 at 15:25 | comment | added | igor | Exactly that one you mentioned, the users value, exactly how you said it: RAW+conversion to be software-agnostic. Thanx! | |
| Jan 19, 2016 at 15:23 | comment | added | mattdm | Would it be worth it? It'd be pretty great for consumers to be able to move RAW images plus conversion instructions from program to program. But what value are you using to judge "worth it"? | |
| Jan 19, 2016 at 15:16 | comment | added | igor | Hm, to get there you need to think; anyway; i am not getting the real answer - would it be worth it? But ok, maybe this is not the subject of the question anymore. Thanx @mattdm | |
| Jan 19, 2016 at 15:13 | comment | added | mattdm | In general with an idea like this, thinking of it is cheap — code does the real convincing. | |
| Jan 19, 2016 at 14:53 | comment | added | igor | and this can start in baby (gorilla) steps, that is the nice part. | |
| Jan 19, 2016 at 14:52 | comment | added | igor | I didn't ask this because it is easy :))) And even gorillas like small bananas! Anyway, i find this cool., but maybe Im wrong, so would like to see what community thinks. | |
| Jan 19, 2016 at 14:49 | comment | added | mattdm | Standards are hard. In order to be really meaningful, you'd have to convince 800lb gorilla Adobe. But, you could start with Rawtherapee, Darktable, Lightzone, Ufraw, and other open source converters, and then maybe convince some of the more niche proprietary players to join in. | |
| Jan 19, 2016 at 14:48 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Jan 19, 2016 at 14:46 | comment | added | igor | Maybe we can work on making this standardized? wdyt @mattdm? | |
| Jan 19, 2016 at 14:40 | history | answered | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |