Skip to main content
Removed the images from the answer due to the privacy concerns of the OP who has removed them from the question and also disabled the links to the flickr account where he posted them.
Source Link
Michael C
  • 176.3k
  • 10
  • 213
  • 578

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

added 178 characters in body
Source Link
Mike Sowsun
  • 12.3k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 38

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Remove pictures as I've edited them into the question itself.
Source Link
Philip Kendall
  • 22.2k
  • 6
  • 68
  • 101

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

Here are your photos showing the settings you used.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

Here are your photos showing the settings you used.

enter image description here

enter image description here

Your main problem is that there was not enough light in the scene. The settings were the same for both images but one is darker than the other. I suspect there was more lighting in the first shot because of the bright highlights visible in the eyes.

f/5.0 was wide open at 35mm or 37mm focal length so you could not open up the aperture. Your choice of 1/500 for a shutter speed means you had to use ISO 12,800 which causes the "noisy" images you see.

You could have slowed the shutter speed 2 stops to 1/125 and that would allow you to decrease the ISO 2 stops to ISO 3200. ISO 3200 would produce a much "cleaner" image but it is still not ideal.

The next step is to add more more ambient lighting or use a flash.

Source Link
Mike Sowsun
  • 12.3k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 38
Loading