Timeline for Is it possible to change depth of field in RAW images?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2015 at 11:44 | vote | accept | Aravin | ||
| Oct 13, 2015 at 11:32 | answer | added | Rafael | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 13, 2015 at 7:56 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhotos/status/653841753674514433 | ||
| Oct 13, 2015 at 4:56 | answer | added | JDługosz | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 20:20 | answer | added | Michael C | timeline score: 9 | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 15:17 | comment | added | Philip Kendall♦ | @chris As above, please don't post short answers as comments - see the meta post I've linked above. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 14:49 | comment | added | chris | I think you can, BUT you would need a lytro camera | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 14:19 | comment | added | Philip Kendall♦ | How to get a miniature effect on pictures without special equipment? and in particular MattGrum's answer is pretty good. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 14:05 | comment | added | mattdm | @Aravin Yes, you definitely can. This isn't a traditional web forum, and there's no problem with "double posting" or anything like that, as long as each question is decent on its own. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:59 | comment | added | Aravin | @mattdm, Can I ask new question? regarding my concern! | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:57 | comment | added | mattdm | It sounds like your question might actually be "How can I simulate the blurred-background effect of shallow DoF in post-processing?". I'm a little surprised, but I think we don't have that already. If that's what you're really after, I encourage you to ask that as a new question. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:53 | comment | added | mattdm | In that case, see How can I get dramatic shallow DOF with a kit lens? | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:51 | comment | added | Aravin | Hello All, I am using 18-55mm lens. I can't get DoF effect in my D5300 if an object is little away from the camera! So I am asking this question!!! | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:50 | answer | added | vclaw | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:38 | comment | added | Philip Kendall♦ | @IliahBorg meta.photo.stackexchange.com/questions/4655/… | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:38 | comment | added | Iliah Borg | DoF is one of the illusions we create in photography (that's why we sometimes say "apparent DoF"), it depends on many things, and can be changed in postprocessing, including cropping and resizing. Raw as a starting point does not give much, if any, advantage for changing DoF. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:08 | comment | added | mattdm | See What's “real” and what's “virtual” on a (digital) camera? for a comprehensive list of what you can and can't change after the fact. | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:07 | history | edited | Philip Kendall♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copyedit
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:07 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
? indicates a question :)
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 13:05 | answer | added | Philip Kendall♦ | timeline score: 25 | |
| Oct 12, 2015 at 12:56 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 12, 2015 at 12:57 | |||||
| Oct 12, 2015 at 12:51 | history | asked | Aravin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |