Timeline for What could cause this visible artifact which seems to a be a glowing inverse of something outside of the frame overlayed on this photograph?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2018 at 1:42 | answer | added | Rob | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 12, 2016 at 20:42 | history | edited | Michael C |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 14, 2015 at 3:11 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/643260730830139392 | ||
| Sep 7, 2015 at 14:21 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Put description in title. Feel free to improve if you can do better :)
|
| Sep 7, 2015 at 2:39 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 14, 2015 at 3:04 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2015 at 2:28 | answer | added | Michael C | timeline score: 11 | |
| Sep 7, 2015 at 2:23 | comment | added | Michael C | possible duplicate of is it normal to get significant lens flare with a 50mm f/1.8 Canon prime lens? | |
| Sep 7, 2015 at 1:55 | comment | added | Michael C | You say it is not ghosting, then you go on to describe the effect by using a classic description of ghosting? | |
| Sep 6, 2015 at 21:32 | history | edited | MikeW |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 6, 2015 at 20:45 | comment | added | Olivier | If it is not visible with the naked eye but you can see it on your image, it probably either moiré, internal reflection in the lens or reflection from an other object. It isn't moiré and it doesn't seem that a planar mirror is around. My bet is on internal reflection | |
| Sep 6, 2015 at 20:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 6, 2015 at 21:32 | |||||
| Sep 6, 2015 at 20:12 | history | asked | Didgeridrew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |