Timeline for How to adjust exposure for both the sky and the landscape?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 29, 2015 at 9:09 | comment | added | Kevin Krumwiede | "HDR images do not look natural." - They can. People just get carried away with the technique, like they did with digital photography itself when it was new. Remember when digital cameras were marketed with completely ridiculous, obviously edited photos? | |
Jul 28, 2015 at 1:51 | comment | added | Michael C | And photo.stackexchange.com/a/45641/15871 | |
Jul 28, 2015 at 1:47 | comment | added | Michael C | "Still HDR images do not look natural." Bad HDR doesn't, but well done HDR doesn't even look like what you think HDR is. For more, see photo.stackexchange.com/a/45670/15871 | |
S Jul 27, 2015 at 22:12 | history | suggested | Damian Yerrick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
lose vs loose; other usage and mechanics
|
Jul 27, 2015 at 20:18 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 27, 2015 at 22:12 | |||||
Jul 27, 2015 at 14:55 | comment | added | mattdm | The problem with comparison to human vision is that while the eye itself has limited dynamic range (even if better than most cameras), the brain has literally infinite dynamic range — and our perception of a scene is not as direct as we imagine it to be, but rather based on our mental model. So, human vision is always going to exceed any mechanical system. | |
Jul 27, 2015 at 11:25 | comment | added | Matthieu Moy | Even if you had a sensor with a high dynamic range, you'd still need a way to get this dynamic range fit in the 8 bits of most people's display. So, you'd get the same issues as with HDR (HDR does two things: combine images to fake a high dynamic range sensor, and then compress the contrast to get a low-range image; you'd need the second part). | |
Jul 27, 2015 at 11:23 | history | edited | Romeo Ninov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
Jul 27, 2015 at 9:46 | comment | added | Romeo Ninov | @Pavan, unfortunately (based on my humble knowledge) I do not know sensor which have dynamic range or human eye. About HDR: Depend of the way you create it and which expression you want to show you can have very good balance and natural look of the photo. Just play with different settings and set the look which pleasant you most :) | |
Jul 27, 2015 at 9:41 | vote | accept | Pavan | ||
Jul 27, 2015 at 9:38 | comment | added | Pavan | Thanks for the answer. I agree with it. But the 2nd method which you mentioned is HDR. Which is liked by most of the people bcs of the high dinamic range it creates with the image. Still HDR images do not look natural. Thats why I had asked this question, to find if any other way available. I just hate it when Camera can not capture the beautiful sky as well as landscape as we can see in our eyes, in above mentioned scenario. :( | |
Jul 27, 2015 at 9:32 | history | edited | Romeo Ninov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
Jul 27, 2015 at 9:13 | history | answered | Romeo Ninov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |