Timeline for Real estate photography: Low distortion lens VS high resolution lens?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2015 at 16:01 | comment | added | Count Iblis | @DavidRicherby You can always stitch the panorama using one of the standard projections first and then you are free to apply whatever mapping you desire to get to the desired final result. There may be some loss of image quality due to the mapping, which is only going cause [problems if this is non uniform (e.g. if the image looks a lot less sharp away from the center). But then if you start out with a high enough resolution, you can remap the image in such a way so as to make the final image look exactly like that image taken with your favorite wide-angle lens. | |
| May 9, 2015 at 20:30 | comment | added | David Richerby | In my experience, stitching together panoramas doesn't work well for situations where it's substituting for a very wide-angle lens. Perhaps Hugin does a better job than other software I've used so I'll give that a go next time I have a panorama to stitch. | |
| May 9, 2015 at 15:54 | history | answered | Count Iblis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |