Skip to main content
still think this is a duplicate, but since it didn't get closed, might as well fix the title :)
Link
mattdm
  • 143.6k
  • 52
  • 421
  • 745

Using When I use FX lenses on a DX camera, does the focal length or minimum aperture change?

Removed signature. Improved formatting
Source Link
mattdm
  • 143.6k
  • 52
  • 421
  • 745

If I put a Nikkor 35mm f/2 FX lens on a DX camera, is it still 35mm f/2, or has either the effective focal length or minimum aperture changed, because it is being used on a smaller format than what it was designed for?

If I put a Nikkor 35mm f/2 FX lens on a DX camera, is it still 35mm f/2 or has either the effective focal length or minimum aperture changed because it is being used on a smaller format than what it was designed for?

If I put a Nikkor 35mm f/2 FX lens on a DX camera, is it still 35mm f/2, or has the effective focal length or minimum aperture changed, because it is being used on a smaller format than what it was designed for?

Removed signature. Improved formatting
Source Link

If I put a Nikkor 35mm f/2 FX lens on a DX camera, is it still 35mm f/2 or has either the effective focal length /or minimum aperture changed because it is being used on a smaller format than what it was designed for?

Thanks, PaulH

If I put a Nikkor 35mm f/2 FX lens on a DX camera, is it still 35mm f/2 or has the effective focal length / minimum aperture changed because it is being used on a smaller format than what it was designed for?

Thanks, PaulH

If I put a Nikkor 35mm f/2 FX lens on a DX camera, is it still 35mm f/2 or has either the effective focal length or minimum aperture changed because it is being used on a smaller format than what it was designed for?

Source Link
PaulH
  • 505
  • 6
  • 8
Loading