Timeline for Is the Tamron 24-70mm a good wedding lens for a Canon 5DS r?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2015 at 11:00 | comment | added | Pete | If it is a church wedding, you might need (e.g. rent) something else, like a 70-200mm f/2.8 for the ceremony - as there is not too much light, and you as a photographer will have to stay at a distance. | |
| Apr 21, 2015 at 23:22 | answer | added | Michael C | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 21, 2015 at 8:52 | vote | accept | lopata | ||
| Apr 21, 2015 at 3:55 | comment | added | Michael C | The Tamron lens is a good enough wedding lens, but I'm not as sure that the 5Ds R is as good a fit. | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 22:27 | comment | added | lopata | mattdm, First and foremost, Will it be compaptible with the 5DSr? Then, I like it for the stabilization but will it be as sharp as a canon EF? Finally, is there a difference with the Tamron A007 version? | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 19:03 | history | edited | MikeW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
tags, title
|
| Apr 20, 2015 at 17:58 | comment | added | mattdm | Theo, can you be a little more specific about what you mean by "good for that camera"? | |
| S Apr 20, 2015 at 17:23 | history | suggested | SailorCire | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Changed body to match title and so I know which camera is being discussed (I thought it was just a 5D SLR).
|
| Apr 20, 2015 at 17:07 | comment | added | Russell McMahon | Best not to accept a sole answer too soon. It may discourage others from answering and somebody may add some useful material. You can de-accept I think - and I'm happy for you to do so. Then if nobody else answers within a few days ... :-) | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 17:04 | vote | accept | lopata | ||
| Apr 20, 2015 at 17:25 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2015 at 16:11 | comment | added | user13451 | @RussellMcMahon I was looking at the type of lens rather than the specifics of that lens. There are far too many different versions of a given lens out there to reasonably do a review (which the Q&A format is poorly designed for) for each one in each situation. The duplicates are more the "is a 24-70 a good lens for these situations." | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 16:08 | comment | added | Russell McMahon | @MichaelT - re ?duplicates?: There is room for more comment on the Tamron even though it is mentioned elsewhere. The lens is relatively new and liable to be around'for a while yet' and some user input is liable to be useful to others. I just bought one. It's astoundingly good. As good as the various user reviews say. Somewhat to my surprise. | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 16:04 | answer | added | Russell McMahon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:58 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 23, 2015 at 12:52 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:53 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 20, 2015 at 17:23 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:50 | comment | added | SailorCire | My best bet would be to look at some sample images first. | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:49 | comment | added | user13451 | Possible duplicate of How do I choose between 24-70 f/4 and 24-105 f/4 Canon lens? or Which one wide-medium lens to buy as the main lens for an outdoor wedding? with additional reading Is the Canon 24mm f/1.4L II good for weddings? and What Canon lenses do you suggest for wedding photography on a tight budget? | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:45 | comment | added | lopata | For wedding photos | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:43 | comment | added | user13451 | Good? In what way? Are you photographing a landscape? sporting event? portraits? Street photography? Hiking up a mountain? | |
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:41 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 20, 2015 at 19:03 | |||||
| Apr 20, 2015 at 15:39 | history | asked | lopata | CC BY-SA 3.0 |