Timeline for Are there reasons to use colour filters with digital cameras?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 30, 2016 at 18:39 | comment | added | Michael C | Reducing the exposure in one channel also allows one to increase the exposure in the other channels without blowing out the channel that is reduced, so it works both ways. If you have way too much red in a scene putting a green filter in front of the lens allows one to increase the exposure (Tv, Av) without blowing out the red channel. | |
Dec 3, 2011 at 1:24 | history | wiki removed | jrista | ||
Sep 11, 2011 at 12:06 | history | rollback | Imre |
Rollback to Revision 12
|
|
Sep 11, 2011 at 12:05 | comment | added | Imre | Editing the post seems to have fixed HTML, unfortunately it had already had so many edits it was also turned into Community Wiki - sorry! | |
Sep 11, 2011 at 11:55 | history | rollback | Imre |
Rollback to Revision 11
|
|
Sep 11, 2011 at 11:53 | history | edited | Imre | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
Sep 8, 2011 at 14:08 | comment | added | Imre | Seems to be a weird now-you-see-now-you-don't game, filed a bug on meta | |
Sep 8, 2011 at 12:02 | comment | added | Karel | @Imre - works for me. | |
Sep 7, 2011 at 10:45 | comment | added | Imre | Could you re-add the second image? It seems to be gone from Imgur. | |
Sep 28, 2010 at 13:33 | comment | added | Evan Krall | It should be noted that a filter can only make the image darker, not lighter. By applying a blue filter, you only get more exposure in the blue channel because you darkened the red and green channels, causing you (or the camera's meter) to increase exposure via shutter speed, aperture, or ISO. | |
Sep 27, 2010 at 7:55 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 48 characters in body
|
Sep 15, 2010 at 14:20 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 108 characters in body
|
Aug 9, 2010 at 21:54 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 141 characters in body
|
Jul 29, 2010 at 19:32 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 228 characters in body
|
Jul 28, 2010 at 18:09 | comment | added | Karel | Thanks. I'm waiting good weather to reshoot my examples with the color filters (like 25A) to prove my second point, but I'm not sure if anybody's interested :) | |
Jul 28, 2010 at 18:06 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Jul 28, 2010 at 17:57 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 246 characters in body; added 124 characters in body; added 3 characters in body
|
Jul 27, 2010 at 23:38 | comment | added | ex-ms | two ways: if you're using the new photo-page beta, there should be a "grab the HTML" under the "share this" menu on the photo page, very quick. The more general way via markdown would be this: ![Alt text for screen-readers](jpg URL) -- see photo.stackexchange.com/editing-help | |
Jul 27, 2010 at 21:19 | comment | added | Karel | I couldn't figure out how to make pictures link, so drag them to separate tab for 100% view. | |
Jul 27, 2010 at 21:01 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 29 characters in body
|
Jul 27, 2010 at 20:54 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 499 characters in body
|
Jul 26, 2010 at 19:15 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 189 characters in body
|
Jul 26, 2010 at 19:08 | history | edited | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 144 characters in body
|
Jul 26, 2010 at 13:17 | vote | accept | Hamish Downer | ||
Jul 16, 2010 at 16:01 | history | answered | Karel | CC BY-SA 2.5 |