Timeline for How to film a eclipse of the sun with a phone cam?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 23, 2015 at 23:45 | vote | accept | user281336 | ||
| Apr 27, 2015 at 9:36 | |||||
| Mar 19, 2015 at 22:31 | vote | accept | user281336 | ||
| Mar 19, 2015 at 23:09 | |||||
| Mar 19, 2015 at 21:37 | comment | added | Jasmine | Only when it's aimed at the sun. With the filter, that's all you'll be able to see. The video shows that. Just tape it over the lense. | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 17:27 | comment | added | Jasmine | If you damage it though, you won't be able to take any pictures. A photo of your sensor burning up isn't going to be interesting in any way. If you manage to get some good shots, please post them here. | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 17:20 | comment | added | Jasmine | I mean actual camera film. I used 35mm negatives for the video. I just bought the film and had them throw it directly into the machine, to develop the "darkest" negative possible. No prints are needed, only the negatives. Sunglasses are no where near dark enough. The problem with photographing an eclipse is that you'll focus an image of the sun onto your sensor. That's how we used to burn ants when I was kid. It WILL BURN YOUR SENSOR, and permanently damage your camera, if the light isn't filtered a lot. | |
| Mar 19, 2015 at 17:18 | history | edited | Jasmine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 119 characters in body
|
| Mar 19, 2015 at 17:11 | history | answered | Jasmine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |