Timeline for How many keywords are possible in Lightroom without a performance penalty?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 14, 2014 at 18:46 | comment | added | ego_ | Hi, thanks for the reply! In ignorance I didn't even consider number of keywords per image, only total number. So, thanks for the head's up on that! | |
| Jul 14, 2014 at 5:46 | comment | added | John Thomas | Sure. In fact any number depends on the concrete hardware and the what means 'acceptable performance' for each user. That's why I tried to give some general guidance/rules to a general question. The actual answer only the one who asked can give. | |
| Jul 13, 2014 at 17:28 | comment | added | dpollitt | @JohnThomas - I agree. Also without quantifying "lack in performance", it would be easy to argue as soon as you add 1 keyword performance is lacking. It is arbitrary as defined and not very useful for anyone. Your answer for example states "keep your total number of keywords at minimum". What exactly does that mean, 10 keywords? 10,000? 1,000,000? None of this is very useful or practical anyways. | |
| Jul 13, 2014 at 17:26 | comment | added | John Thomas | Please note that he didn't ask if the program has a hard-coded upper limit. He asked till where is possible to go up "without experiencing lack in performance" | |
| Jul 12, 2014 at 20:42 | history | answered | dpollitt | CC BY-SA 3.0 |