Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 24, 2014 at 14:31 comment added AJ Henderson By the way, just to be clear, the current down vote isn't mine. I removed it when I saw that you did actually address the theft thing, even if I don't personally think it is a particularly useful way to address it, but I don't think it is downvote worthy personally, just not upvote worthy.
Apr 23, 2014 at 19:38 history edited AJ Henderson CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Apr 23, 2014 at 19:36 comment added AJ Henderson Err, wow, I somehow missed the part about separating the cards, though I don't think that is particularly practical as it then involves having to take the card out after any use and put it in before any use or photos get missed and if you forget to remove it or the camera gets stolen while using it, the card is still lost.
Apr 23, 2014 at 19:13 comment added tenmiles @AJHenderson Does my answer not address the theft issue? What would you do differently to prevent against theft?
Apr 23, 2014 at 16:14 comment added tenmiles @AJ I think it depends on how narrowly you interpret the original question. To me, this question is about using redundancy to prevent against data loss and not just can that specific camera model mirror one full SD card to another blank SD card.
Apr 23, 2014 at 16:14 comment added mattdm @AJ Yes, although I think the option of using simultaneous writes accomplishes the same goal and is probably better than the planned workflow, although to address the theft/loss concern you'd want to have a new secondary card for every day.
Apr 23, 2014 at 16:06 review Low quality posts
Apr 23, 2014 at 16:36
Apr 23, 2014 at 16:01 comment added AJ Henderson While this makes a correct observation about the intended use of the dual SD card slots, it only addresses the original question by saying "I don't know." This is really a comment.
Apr 23, 2014 at 14:23 history answered tenmiles CC BY-SA 3.0