Timeline for If shooting in RAW and processing, why still care about WB?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 7, 2014 at 3:03 | comment | added | Carlos Irineu | I'm at the Nikon D7000 level although I've owned other cameras - I like the NEX sensor, I just don't like the NEX, for example, and I have a Sigma Dp2 Foveon. So … "accuracy" might be important for product shots, art books, architecture books… There's more than that, however. Yes, if the Auto WB or any other reasonable setting works, great, I will use it, but sometimes it's "not anything" and setting Kelvin manually in a D7000 is frustrating. The NEX's were, for me, better suited for that. I'm exploring this issue, trying to figure out new ways. Tks! | |
| Mar 6, 2014 at 18:24 | history | answered | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |