Timeline for Body difference of D90 and D7100
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2014 at 23:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/535220885125619712 | ||
| S Oct 30, 2014 at 15:51 | history | edited | TFuto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fix grammar/logic and add tags for the cameras discussed.
|
| S Oct 30, 2014 at 15:51 | history | suggested | Adam O'Dwyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fix grammar/logic and add tags for the cameras discussed.
|
| Oct 30, 2014 at 15:30 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 30, 2014 at 15:51 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 14:22 | vote | accept | localhost | ||
| Jan 29, 2014 at 19:28 | answer | added | D. Lambert | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 19:17 | comment | added | localhost | @AJHenderson Charger is not much of concern, its the body that is as its feel light material than d90 was made up on. Is it? | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 19:11 | comment | added | AJ Henderson♦ | I wouldn't worry too much about the battery charger. My Canon 5D Mark iii is very solidly built with an allow interior, but still has a battery charger made of simple plastic. I can't speak to the camera body though, however I'd look at the rest of the improved specs first before looking at the build quality itself. It does appear that new D90s sell for only slightly less than new D7100s though (about $150-$200 difference). | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 18:52 | comment | added | localhost | @dpollitt no, just the body of the camera plus charger. | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 18:43 | comment | added | dpollitt | You are worried about the battery charger construction? | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 18:32 | history | asked | localhost | CC BY-SA 3.0 |