Timeline for Why it is said that sharpening is always needed in digital pictures?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2014 at 22:41 | comment | added | Esa Paulasto | @Cornelius - Thank you for the link. A great explanation there. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 14:36 | comment | added | Cornelius | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unsharp_masking makes a good explanation of how unsharp masking works with film photographs. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 9:59 | comment | added | Esa Paulasto | I don't get that part about film. I don't know a way to "sharpen" film photographs if not by manual retouching to enhance edges. When you use a scanner to digitize a film photograph it no longer is what was meant in the question, the way I read it. | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 6:45 | comment | added | drfrogsplat | I think its commonly said that you need to sharpen for your target viewing size, which may simply get understood as a general need to sharpen. This answer kind of says how to choose an appropriate sharpening radius: photo.stackexchange.com/a/9447/889 | |
| Jan 8, 2014 at 5:19 | history | answered | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |