Timeline for How would Yashica M lenses compare with modern Canon lenses in terms of image quality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2013 at 15:43 | comment | added | Joanne C | I can't make a direct comparison to Canon lenses, but manual lenses are fun to have. Keep in mind that these are old lenses, so they don't take advantage of advances in technology. The "ML" designation from Yashica indicated a better quality (coated) lens, so that should be preferred. See here for some info: cdegroot.com/photo-yashica/yashica-slr-faq-4.html on the basics of the lenses. Anyways, if they're really cheap, why not go for it? | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 23:01 | answer | added | AJ Henderson♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 18:08 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/386553593958264832 | ||
| Oct 5, 2013 at 17:45 | comment | added | Evan Pak | Remember that these lenses won't be able to take advantage of auto-focus or auto-exposure. Not that this can't be a good deal, I use an adapted lens myself. | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 12:58 | history | asked | Saqib Khan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |