Timeline for Which Canon superzoom to select for clearer sports pictures? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2013 at 16:53 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
| Oct 2, 2013 at 16:43 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Oct 9, 2013 at 3:38 | |||||
| Oct 2, 2013 at 16:23 | history | edited | Michael C | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Oct 2, 2013 at 13:28 | vote | accept | weera | ||
| Oct 1, 2013 at 2:18 | history | closed |
MikeW mattdm Itai AJ Henderson♦ Caleb |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Oct 1, 2013 at 0:17 | comment | added | AJ Henderson♦ | @MichaelClark - ok, that's fair. I wasn't thinking about something like basketball where you could actually be that close to where action would be occurring. Most of my experience with sports is things more like baseball where you always have some distance between you. It was more of an actual question and you answered it though, so thanks and +1 to your comment. | |
| Oct 1, 2013 at 0:15 | comment | added | Michael C | @AJHenderson I agree with you about the two bodies, but there are plenty of iconic images of sporting events that were taken using wide angle lenses. Just in the first 25, #'s 1, 5, 13, 19, 20, and 25 all used fairly wide lenses. sportsillustrated.cnn.com/main/photos/1212/… | |
| Sep 30, 2013 at 14:03 | comment | added | AJ Henderson♦ | @weera - what are you doing at a sporting event that requires anything down around the 18mm range? If you are considering L optics as an option, you'd be better off to go with two cheaper, shorter range lenses and then buy another camera body. | |
| Sep 28, 2013 at 17:03 | answer | added | Jumpto | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 28, 2013 at 16:21 | comment | added | mattdm | See also photo.stackexchange.com/questions/23155/… | |
| Sep 28, 2013 at 11:49 | vote | accept | weera | ||
| Sep 28, 2013 at 11:49 | |||||
| Sep 28, 2013 at 9:47 | history | edited | MikeW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body; edited title
|
| Sep 28, 2013 at 9:28 | answer | added | Michael C | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 28, 2013 at 6:48 | comment | added | weera | Appreciate your comments.I don't have any other lenses except EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS. I need to keep one lense rather than keep 2,3 lenses .During an event like a sport event,I do have to keep changing lenses if I do not have full range lense(eg 18-300).So I am thinking to go for 18-300 one.My question is does it give more clarity,picturs than the one I am using ?Or otherwise the only difference of this is the more range because it is 18-300??My camera is canon 650D.Thanks | |
| Sep 28, 2013 at 6:48 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 1, 2013 at 2:18 | |||||
| Sep 28, 2013 at 6:31 | comment | added | Håkon K. Olafsen | It's unclear what you are asking for here. It would be better if you tell us what you use your camera for and what you want to achieve. | |
| Sep 28, 2013 at 6:23 | comment | added | Michael C | What, if any, other lenses do you already own in addition to the EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS? | |
| Sep 28, 2013 at 6:21 | comment | added | Michael C | What,exactly, do you want in a lens that is different from the lens you currently have? | |
| Sep 28, 2013 at 6:03 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 28, 2013 at 6:30 | |||||
| Sep 28, 2013 at 5:44 | history | asked | weera | CC BY-SA 3.0 |