Timeline for Why is F/8-F/11 called a "Who cares aperture"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 23, 2013 at 4:18 | comment | added | jrista | @BlueRaja-DannyPflughoeft: Actually, f-number takes focal length into account. Diffraction at the sensor plane is solely dependent upon f-number. A short lens with an f/4 aperture means light travels a shorter distance to the sensor than an f/4 aperture on a long lens. The greater distance traveled means light spreads out more, so the effect of diffraction with a long f/4 lens is the same as with a short f/4 lens. | |
Jul 23, 2013 at 4:16 | comment | added | jrista | @Shizam: The best aperture, and what aperture is really diffraction-limited, really depends on the lens. The concept of DLA, or Diffraction-limited Aperture, as it pertains to a sensor has to do with the aperture of a theoretically perfect lens at which diffraction would begin to affect IQ. If the lens is aberration limited at f/5.6, then it doesn't matter if the sensor DLA is f/5.6. If the lens doesn't become diffraction limited until f/8, then it is quite likely, even with a high resolution sensor, that you could get better results by stopping down. | |
Jul 22, 2013 at 22:47 | comment | added | BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft | "if you look at lens tests of any really good lenses and the peak sharpness tends to be at f/4" - The amount of diffraction primarily depends on the physical size of the aperture, but the physical size of "f/4" depends on the focal length. f/4 at 15mm will actually be physically smaller than f/5.6 at 100mm, and thus should exhibit more diffraction, despite being a smaller f-number. So I think the aperture at which "diffraction has a measurable effect with a high megapixel DSLR" must be dependent on both the f-number and the focal length. | |
Jul 22, 2013 at 20:48 | comment | added | Matt Grum | @Shizam I should have said "detect" rather than "see" but if you look at lens tests of any really good lenses and the peak sharpness tends to be at f/4, meaning diffraction is causing the f/5.6 image to be softer. | |
Jul 22, 2013 at 20:46 | history | edited | Matt Grum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
Jul 22, 2013 at 19:34 | vote | accept | Andy M | ||
Jul 22, 2013 at 19:22 | comment | added | Shizam | Could you provide references for diffraction being visible as low as f5.6 on high MP DSLRs? I ask because the commonly held theory 'when in doubt shoot at f8 for maximum sharpness' wouldn't be the case anymore and I'd wanna know! :) | |
Jul 22, 2013 at 11:46 | history | edited | Matt Grum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
Jul 22, 2013 at 9:30 | history | answered | Matt Grum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |