Skip to main content
Photography

Return to Question

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/352607928269815809
edited title
Link
Michael C
Michael C
  • 176.3k
  • 10
  • 213
  • 578

Is trading a Canon 18-135 lens135mm + 24mm lenses for a 17-40L non-IS +40mm L or 70-200L200mm f/4 L a good decision?

Improved title and body formatting
Source Link
edit approved Jul 3, 2013 at 15:35
Chait
edit approved Jul 3, 2013 at 15:35
Chait
  • 647
  • 10
  • 24

Trading Is trading a Canon 18-135 lens for non isa 17-40 and40L non-IS + 70-200 f4. Worth it200L f/4 a good decision?

I currently have a Canon 60d60D with aan 18-135 lens and a 24 mm 2f/2.8 lens I hardly use. I really fancy athe 24-105L IS (colour, sharpness, etc) and athe 100-400L for the length (Freud would have something to say here..).

The thing is someoneSomeone offered me to trade the two lenses I have for either a 17-40 L they have or a 70-200 f4f/4 L (non IS) and cover the otherrest with cash. I feel like these 2 would be a good enough focal length coverage for me, vs the 24-105. The only issue I have is the lack of IS. What do you guys think?

Some representative photos for what I take: http://500px.com/andreiblack

Hugely indebted for your advice!.

Trading Canon 18-135 for non is 17-40 and 70-200 f4. Worth it?

I currently have a Canon 60d with a 18-135 and a 24 mm 2.8 I hardly use. I really fancy a 24-105L IS (colour, sharpness, etc) and a 100-400L for the length (Freud would have something to say here..).

The thing is someone offered me to trade the two lenses I have for either a 17-40 L they have or a 70-200 f4 L (non IS) and cover the other with cash. I feel like these 2 would be a good enough focal length coverage for me, vs the 24-105. The only issue I have is the lack of IS. What do you guys think?

Some representative photos for what I take: http://500px.com/andreiblack

Hugely indebted for your advice!

Is trading a Canon 18-135 lens for a 17-40L non-IS + 70-200L f/4 a good decision?

I currently have a Canon 60D with an 18-135 lens and a 24 mm f/2.8 lens I hardly use. I really fancy the 24-105L IS (colour, sharpness, etc) and the 100-400L for the length (Freud would have something to say here..).

Someone offered me to trade the two lenses I have for either a 17-40 L or a 70-200 f/4 L (non IS) and cover the rest with cash. I feel like these 2 would be a good enough focal length coverage for me, vs the 24-105. The only issue I have is the lack of IS. What do you guys think?

Some representative photos for what I take: http://500px.com/andreiblack.

Source Link
Andrei
Andrei
  • 33
  • 2

Trading Canon 18-135 for non is 17-40 and 70-200 f4. Worth it?

I currently have a Canon 60d with a 18-135 and a 24 mm 2.8 I hardly use. I really fancy a 24-105L IS (colour, sharpness, etc) and a 100-400L for the length (Freud would have something to say here..).

The thing is someone offered me to trade the two lenses I have for either a 17-40 L they have or a 70-200 f4 L (non IS) and cover the other with cash. I feel like these 2 would be a good enough focal length coverage for me, vs the 24-105. The only issue I have is the lack of IS. What do you guys think?

Some representative photos for what I take: http://500px.com/andreiblack

Hugely indebted for your advice!