Timeline for 5D Mark III or 6D [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 28, 2013 at 18:37 | history | closed |
mattdm Paul Cezanne dpollitt Itai AJ Henderson♦ |
too localized | |
May 28, 2013 at 18:22 | vote | accept | Hannes | ||
May 28, 2013 at 16:46 | comment | added | Michael C | This review discusses the differences between the 6D and the 5DIII at the end of the review. There's even a chart that compares the specs of the 5DII, 6D, and 5DIII. the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/… | |
May 28, 2013 at 16:39 | comment | added | Michael C | I own both a 5DII and a 50D. I can shoot with the 5DII at a little over one stop higher ISO than the 50D and get about the same performance in low light. The 5DIII is about 1 stop better than the 5DII based on most reviews (and examples) I've seen. So the 5DIII would be a little over 2 stops better in low light. That's quite a jump! The same shutter speed at f/2.8 on the 5DIII would need f/1 on the 50D to get comparable noise! | |
May 28, 2013 at 13:33 | comment | added | dpollitt | Your update really shows no real reason why to upgrade. The 50D can already shoot video(install magic lantern), it can print very large, and does well in low light(although the two you are looking at buying could be potentially a stop better). I wouldn't upgrade if I were you - unless you have clear reasons for doing so. | |
May 28, 2013 at 13:11 | answer | added | AJ Henderson♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
May 28, 2013 at 13:05 | comment | added | Joanne C | I still think this could generalize a bit more, to be honest, to make it more useful long term. Both Canon and Nikon offer a consumer oriented FF and a more professional FF that are close in price (5D mkIII/6D and D800/D600) and reasons for selecting between the two would be quite similar. | |
May 28, 2013 at 12:53 | comment | added | Hannes | thank you @damnedtruths i added my criterias in my question | |
May 28, 2013 at 12:53 | history | edited | Hannes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added additional criterias
|
May 28, 2013 at 11:58 | comment | added | damned truths | Is there something specific that you want that will be gained from these cameras (e.g. you may want to print big and so need those extra pixels, or you may be shooting in low light so the better ISO handling may be a big advantage). Giving specific needs and wants will help differentiate between the cameras, and may make the question slightly more answerable. | |
May 28, 2013 at 10:49 | comment | added | Joanne C | See Q&A is Hard, Let's Go Shopping for why you're getting down votes and close votes. | |
May 28, 2013 at 10:48 | review | Close votes | |||
May 28, 2013 at 18:38 | |||||
May 28, 2013 at 10:45 | answer | added | Mike | timeline score: 3 | |
May 28, 2013 at 10:33 | review | First posts | |||
May 28, 2013 at 11:58 | |||||
May 28, 2013 at 10:31 | answer | added | Matt Grum | timeline score: 10 | |
May 28, 2013 at 10:14 | history | asked | Hannes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |