Timeline for What time of day provides the best Natural lighting for Macro Photography?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2013 at 6:36 | vote | accept | damned truths | ||
| Apr 7, 2013 at 13:34 | comment | added | Joanne C | @StanRogers - Fair enough, I'm just thinking about how people are more likely to view it today. | |
| Apr 7, 2013 at 10:52 | history | edited | damned truths | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 36 characters in body
|
| Apr 7, 2013 at 9:16 | comment | added | user2719 | "Macro" means more than just 1:1 reproduction; it has historically meant the range between 1:4 and 4:1 (where "micro" takes over). And even that meaning becomes fuzzy where small sensors are concerned; pedantically true macro on a 1/2.3" sensor would be silliness for its own sake. (And let's not forget that ISO 1600 is pretty much just another setting these days, not a tragedy.) | |
| Apr 7, 2013 at 3:16 | comment | added | Joanne C | Either that or you should break this into two questions. | |
| Apr 7, 2013 at 3:16 | comment | added | Joanne C | My feeling is that the answer might be different when you discuss true macro subjects as opposed to flowers. When you're going 1:1 or better, light volume becomes much, much, more important. The title seems misleading in that respect. | |
| Apr 7, 2013 at 3:13 | comment | added | damned truths | JoanneC: Yes, lots of the time. I also do use other subjects. | |
| Apr 7, 2013 at 3:10 | comment | added | Joanne C | Not sure I'd call this macro if the focus is flowers. Are you working with 1:1 sizes? | |
| Apr 7, 2013 at 2:17 | answer | added | user2719 | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 7, 2013 at 2:14 | history | edited | mattdm |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 7, 2013 at 1:48 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/320714585999015936 | ||
| Apr 7, 2013 at 1:35 | history | asked | damned truths | CC BY-SA 3.0 |