Timeline for When is a 180° split focusing screen better than a 45° one?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2013 at 11:15 | history | edited | Esa Paulasto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
replaced raster with microprisms
|
| Mar 21, 2013 at 10:54 | comment | added | Esa Paulasto | Yep, it is microprisms all right. Going to edit my answer accordingly. | |
| Mar 21, 2013 at 8:05 | comment | added | Michael Nielsen | I've seen different typs of supportive elements, where I perceive "microprisms" as a course diamondlike surface (see EC-a p4 on the link), and I perceive "raster" as a similar thing as the matte screens, but even more matte. focusingscreen.com/privacy.php | |
| Mar 21, 2013 at 5:28 | comment | added | Esa Paulasto | Terminology again. Microprisms is the thing I called a raster, right? | |
| Mar 21, 2013 at 5:24 | history | edited | Esa Paulasto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Refined the conditions after diggin up my old SLR and testing with it ;)
|
| Mar 21, 2013 at 5:14 | history | answered | Esa Paulasto | CC BY-SA 3.0 |