Timeline for Does crop factor increase the minimum focus distance?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2013 at 5:48 | vote | accept | zzzbbx | ||
| Feb 5, 2013 at 5:48 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2013 at 0:49 | comment | added | Yiğit Hür Ulaş | Since it's night here I cant confirm 'cause I used to own a 100mm before I got my 2x extender, gotta answer that tomorrow to call a friend | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 0:35 | comment | added | zzzbbx | I just double checked, and they are only compatible with the 180mm Macro, not the 100mm... | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 0:27 | vote | accept | zzzbbx | ||
| Feb 5, 2013 at 0:34 | |||||
| Feb 4, 2013 at 20:14 | comment | added | Yiğit Hür Ulaş | Extention tubes have no lens(glass element) inside which allows you to make close-up alike focusing capabilities. But by that you are losing you ability to focus to infinity. On the other hand extenders gives you a multiplier and preserves your lenses minimum focus distance and infinity focus capability. The extender's disadvantage is as I'm using canon's, 1.4 extender makes you lose 1 f stop and 2 extender makes you lose 2 f stops. | |
| Feb 4, 2013 at 19:53 | comment | added | zzzbbx | What would be the difference between using an extender as opposed to extension tubes, if any, on a macro lens? | |
| Feb 4, 2013 at 14:26 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 4, 2013 at 14:36 | |||||
| Feb 4, 2013 at 14:10 | history | answered | Yiğit Hür Ulaş | CC BY-SA 3.0 |