Timeline for How do lens lineups vary across Mirrorless camera systems?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2016 at 14:01 | comment | added | kazanaki | There are 7 Canon EM-M lenses now (2016) | |
| Mar 14, 2014 at 19:31 | comment | added | Chinmay Kanchi | With the release of the A7/A7r, Sony's E-mount has now been split into two (full-frame, designated FE and APS-C, designated E). While (I think) all E-mount lenses will fit the full-frame cameras, only some of them will actually project a large enough image circle to cover the whole sensor. At the date of posting, there seem to be only 5 FE lenses. | |
| Jun 29, 2013 at 11:53 | comment | added | pilsetnieks | Canon EF-M has another 11-22mm f/4-5.6 lens now, bringing the count to three. | |
| Feb 5, 2013 at 3:45 | vote | accept | mattdm | ||
| S Feb 5, 2013 at 3:06 | history | suggested | drfrogsplat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
minor grammar + ambiguity fixes
|
| Feb 5, 2013 at 2:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 5, 2013 at 3:06 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2013 at 2:21 | history | edited | Itai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typos, 3D Lens
|
| Jan 25, 2013 at 17:54 | comment | added | Phil | About a year ago I considered making an inverse teleconverter for the usage of Nikon FX lenses on DX sensors, just to help with wide angle usage. If the response is so strong, maybe I should further investigate. I've also been planing to make a shift adapter, but for FX to DX usage it will require an optical element to increase image plane distance. | |
| Jan 22, 2013 at 14:34 | history | edited | Itai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fuji aperture ring
|
| Jan 22, 2013 at 14:31 | comment | added | Itai | Indeed, I just blogged about the inverse teleconverter as you call it. This is big news in my opinion. Not sure if it should be included but it should definitely go in interesting accessories for mirrorless cameras along with the shift adaptor that takes a DSLR lens and turns into a shift-lens because the imaging circle is larger. | |
| Jan 22, 2013 at 6:17 | comment | added | j-g-faustus | +1. A couple of unusual (for DSLR) options: An f/0.95 for Sony E, m4/3 and soon Canon M. And an "inverse teleconverter" for mounting Canon EF lenses on Sony NEX that reduces the focal length with 0.71x and gains one f-stop in the process. Don't know if things like this should be included? Listing every adapter in existence would be unwieldy, but some of these more unusual options might be a reason to prefer one system over another. | |
| Jan 21, 2013 at 23:56 | history | edited | Itai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2013 at 23:15 | history | edited | Itai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
weather-sealed lenses
|
| Jan 21, 2013 at 23:11 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 21, 2013 at 23:01 | history | answered | Itai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |