Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 2, 2015 at 1:07 answer added shawn timeline score: 0
Jan 7, 2013 at 12:29 comment added Blrfl The 55-300 is a consumer lens and isn't going to turn in the same kind of work as Nikon's better glass, especially at its extremes. Rent something good, like the 300mm f/2.8, for a week and you'll understand why those lenses are more expensive by a factor of ten.
Jan 7, 2013 at 4:02 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/288133429604790272
Jan 7, 2013 at 0:27 history edited Debbie CC BY-SA 3.0
added 164 characters in body
Jan 7, 2013 at 0:15 comment added Itai This complete image softness looks like incorrect focus. You have stripped the EXIF information, so I cannot say for use there is a problem with camera settings, however it is most likely your camera was not focused properly. It is possible you camera cannot focus with this lens past a certain distance in which case you have to send both camera and lens to Nikon for calibration. It is also possible there was not enough light but without the EXIF I cannot confirm either.
Jan 7, 2013 at 0:06 comment added Debbie I had to add 2 links from photobucket. I am not allow to post pictures till I have 10 posts
Jan 7, 2013 at 0:06 history edited Debbie CC BY-SA 3.0
added 280 characters in body
Jan 6, 2013 at 23:35 answer added Itai timeline score: 1
Jan 6, 2013 at 23:22 comment added Itai Please supply an example, if you want a response to address you particular situation. At this point we do not know what the source of blur is (back/front-focus, subject motion, photographer motion, lens softness, etc).
Jan 6, 2013 at 23:12 history edited Omne
edited tags
Jan 6, 2013 at 20:58 review First posts
Jan 6, 2013 at 22:23
Jan 6, 2013 at 20:41 history asked Debbie CC BY-SA 3.0