Timeline for What reduces blur from camera movement more: large aperture or image stabilisation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 7, 2013 at 7:40 | comment | added | Michael Nielsen | It doesn't give 1.6x magnification. It has a 1.6x crop factor. | |
| Jan 6, 2013 at 16:51 | comment | added | mattdm | For exposure, no, sensor size doesn't matter. That's because exposure is per area. Imagine if you take a picture and crop it in post processing — the exposure doesn't change. But depth of field is effectively increased (assuming you view or print at the same size). And here, if you crop in post processing but enlarge the print, you'll see the same thing. (There should be detailed information about both of these questions in existing QA on this site if you search.) | |
| Jan 6, 2013 at 11:45 | vote | accept | BartoNaz | ||
| Jan 6, 2013 at 11:44 | comment | added | BartoNaz | Thanks. This is really a lot of very useful information. But I have now another question about aperture. All parameters for lenses are written ragarding full 35mm frame size. In my Canon 600D I have cropped sensor that gives 1.6 magnification factor. That of course changes the resulting focal length range, but does it influence actual aperture in any way? And if there are full size and cropped size lenses, will the effective aperture differ between them when used on cropped sensor, due to different relative size of aperture? | |
| Jan 6, 2013 at 5:35 | history | answered | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |