Timeline for What reduces blur from camera movement more: large aperture or image stabilisation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2013 at 21:19 | comment | added | Itai | Shooting at one full stop wider lets you use roughly a shutter-speed one stop slower for average cases. This break down at slow shutter-speeds when hand-holding becomes more difficult (say 1/8s or slower). Also stabilization only corrects for some shake movements, while a faster shutter-speed is always beneficial, so I would prefer a higher shutter-speed than stabilization. | |
| Jan 5, 2013 at 21:09 | comment | added | BartoNaz | Fair enough. But what about numeric relation between shutter speed and aperture for the same exposure? How much do I gain in shutter speed when I increase aperture by some value? And is this relation linear through all aperture values? I just wonder what is more effective: IS or aperture? I suppose that degradation of image sharpness due to change of aperture is always smaller that from not or wrongly compensated handshaking? Or am I wrong? | |
| Jan 5, 2013 at 21:03 | history | answered | Itai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |