Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 30 at 13:52 history edited scottbb CC BY-SA 4.0
rmv defunct caution about https
Jul 29 at 20:39 comment added Mateen Ulhaq In most of those examples, I would go with Q ∈ [53, 61] on a budget, and Q ∈ [69, 76] for a bit more quality without file size blowing up. The discoloration, loss of sharpness, and other artifacts are still visible to a careful eye for the detailed/high-frequency images -- particularly if compared with the original reference image. For no-reference quality, I guess it's a bit more debatable.
Nov 12, 2023 at 14:40 comment added Mark Ransom @KevinWheeler if you're looking at image detail down to the pixel, you should use no subsampling at all. It can really damage the image particularly in areas of red. Unfortunately I'm not familiar with Gimp specifically so I can't give guidance there.
S Nov 1, 2023 at 19:36 history edited Euri Pinhollow CC BY-SA 4.0
https default will give 404 Not Found Error.
S Nov 1, 2023 at 19:36 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 4.0
https default will give 404 Not Found Error.
Oct 31, 2023 at 17:26 review Suggested edits
S Nov 1, 2023 at 19:36
Aug 1, 2022 at 23:24 comment added Kevin Wheeler In Gimp, what subsampling should you use?
Aug 1, 2022 at 22:50 comment added Kevin Wheeler File sizes being equal, it's also better to use a high resolution high compression photo than a low resolution, low compression photo.
Dec 7, 2012 at 14:45 comment added santiagozky I was not aware of how jpg compression works. your answer (and the link) provided an good insight. Before I thought that pictures with more detail would require more quality. your answer was very helpful.
Dec 7, 2012 at 14:43 vote accept santiagozky
Dec 6, 2012 at 18:48 history answered jrista CC BY-SA 3.0