Timeline for Is a Canon SX 50 a useful camera for a DSLR-Photographer?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2013 at 4:14 | answer | added | jjok | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 12, 2012 at 21:59 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/268110900366557184 | ||
| Nov 12, 2012 at 10:17 | vote | accept | TSGames | ||
| S Nov 12, 2012 at 3:28 | history | suggested | Peng Tuck Kwok |
Added flag for telephoto
|
|
| Nov 12, 2012 at 3:14 | answer | added | Itai | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 12, 2012 at 1:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 12, 2012 at 3:28 | |||||
| Nov 11, 2012 at 23:38 | comment | added | TSGames | I'm talking about to use it as a second camera for the main-purposes of tele-shoots, and don't want to compare there overall functionality/quality, which is kind of senseless. | |
| Nov 11, 2012 at 23:08 | answer | added | dpollitt | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 11, 2012 at 22:59 | comment | added | dpollitt | This reminds me of this question:Why doesn't it make sense to compare an entry-level DSLR with a super zoom? | |
| Nov 11, 2012 at 19:01 | history | asked | TSGames | CC BY-SA 3.0 |