Timeline for Why are macros from my new DSLR no better than those from my P&S?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2012 at 15:44 | history | edited | Matt Grum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Oct 8, 2012 at 15:44 | comment | added | Matt Grum | @ElendilTheTall I've corrected the answer to make it more clear what I meant. You can always photograph objects, no matter how small they are with any camera/lens, the difference is how much of the frame is filled. | |
| Oct 8, 2012 at 14:55 | comment | added | ElendilTheTall | Perhaps I'm being dense, but I don't understand this. Say a compact sensor, for the sake of argument, is 1cm, then you can reproduce a 1cm object at 1:1 on it; great. But surely you can image that same object at 1:1 on a 3.5cm DSLR too, you'd just have more extraneous stuff around it? | |
| Oct 6, 2012 at 22:55 | history | answered | Matt Grum | CC BY-SA 3.0 |