Timeline for Are DSLRs a dying breed, making now the time to switch to a mirrorless camera system?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2013 at 1:00 | review | Late answers | |||
| Jan 22, 2013 at 1:31 | |||||
| Jan 22, 2013 at 0:55 | comment | added | Michael Nielsen | e: so they will get bigger like a Eos 1D with gribability in landscape and portrait framing alike, and fingertip control of shutterspeed and aperture from both orientations, as well as a large optical viewfinder? f: being the same crop sensors inside how can this be true? if you compare raw iso 6400-12800 from the flagship nex7 to eos 7D here: dpreview.com/reviews/sonynex7/page26.asp I'd say 7D has the advantage with its larger pixels. If you add DSLR Eos 6D to the comparison matrix, voila, even iso 12800 looks pretty nice. g: I thought high fps was useful for action shooters? | |
| Jan 22, 2013 at 0:44 | comment | added | Michael Nielsen | a: erh, nex7 is 24mp, eos 7d is 18mp. who is barking up treews of the MP fetishists? b: are you referring to optical viewfinders? or insinuating that digital viewfinders "very soon" (next year?20 years?) will be on par with optical ones? c: Eos 5D is too small without a battery pack, so how is a camera smaller than a puny rebel any "fun"? d: sound. point taken. mech sound is better than digital mimick sound , though, haha. mindblowing framerate. Mine does 6.5fps, which is generally too fast, so I slow it down to 3. Do you want a video camera or a photo camera? | |
| S Jul 18, 2012 at 18:23 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Format with markdown
|
| S Jul 18, 2012 at 18:23 | history | suggested | cababunga | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added linebreaks between list items
|
| Jul 18, 2012 at 18:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 18, 2012 at 18:23 | |||||
| Jul 18, 2012 at 17:08 | comment | added | mattdm | I'm also curious why you describe yourself as "unhappy" while noting that the shortcomings are tending to be improved. Can you elaborate on that? | |
| Jul 18, 2012 at 17:06 | comment | added | mattdm | I think you're generally right, but I question the assertion that recent prosumer cameras produce "terribly noisy" images. In general, in fact, the trend has been towards amazingly high-quality images, with significantly lower noise than previous generations, even at high ISOs. | |
| Jul 18, 2012 at 16:17 | history | answered | Quazi Ahmed Hussain | CC BY-SA 3.0 |