Timeline for What is a great portrait lens for Nikon (under $1000)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2012 at 16:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/222730544201469952 | ||
| Oct 21, 2010 at 11:31 | comment | added | Samrat Patil | i own a nikon 50mm 1.4 prime...and it's definitely not bad for the field of view as people talk about it...50 mm is extremely practical field of view for the usual shoot even for a D90. | |
| Aug 13, 2010 at 21:59 | history | edited | Craig Walker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 26 characters in body
|
| Aug 11, 2010 at 16:31 | comment | added | Craig Walker | If you're looking to get/use ONLY 1 lens, then it might be worth your while to get the 28-70. But the 50 and the 35 are so cheap that you'd have to value convenience a lot to make that decision worthwhile. | |
| Aug 11, 2010 at 14:58 | comment | added | newfie_coder | Good points. I have considered the 35mm prime since I shoot indoors often... but I like the idea of zoom for just the reason you mention - walking around. I also have a tough time justifying $1k more than a 1.8f prime though... | |
| Aug 11, 2010 at 14:26 | history | answered | Craig Walker | CC BY-SA 2.5 |