Timeline for Real-time vs post-production blurs — what's the difference?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 12, 2015 at 20:30 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
missing word
|
| May 19, 2012 at 3:02 | vote | accept | blunders | ||
| May 19, 2012 at 0:12 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 583 characters in body
|
| May 19, 2012 at 0:02 | comment | added | mattdm | @blunders: I think it depends on the subject and how well the effect was done, but in general, yes, at least for expert observers. I like to think I'd not be fooled by Matt Grum's simulated tilt-shift photograph, but it's easy to spot the tell-tales if you know in advance. | |
| May 18, 2012 at 23:59 | comment | added | blunders | +1 @mattdm: Does that mean looking at one-time of photo compared to the other people would be able to tell the difference, or it's unlikely? | |
| May 18, 2012 at 23:56 | history | answered | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |