Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 6, 2012 at 23:30 answer added Michael Cook timeline score: 0
Mar 5, 2012 at 17:40 answer added Mark timeline score: 3
Mar 5, 2012 at 15:13 comment added Dan Wolfgang I think that without a photo we can only offer conjecture, which makes this question only marginally useful, right?
Mar 5, 2012 at 9:10 comment added Joe @Pete I have significantly expanded my comment into an answer.
Mar 5, 2012 at 9:07 answer added Joe timeline score: 7
Mar 5, 2012 at 8:46 comment added Pete @Joe, I think you are correct in your guess, and I think you should post it as an answer instead of a comment.
Mar 5, 2012 at 8:28 answer added Korinna timeline score: 0
Mar 5, 2012 at 7:42 comment added Joe at f/3.5, your problem might be shallow depth of field combined with being slightly out of focus. This is especially likely if the subject is moving towards or away from you.
Mar 5, 2012 at 7:31 answer added Mike Axiak timeline score: 5
Mar 5, 2012 at 2:32 comment added Alen Max out your ISO setting, you might have a lot of noise but it's better than not getting the shot at all. And slow down your shutter to 1/500th of sec. Maybe even slower. Shooting fast moving objects is more about anticipation. Also, make sure you have some kind of support, like monopod or tripod.
Mar 5, 2012 at 0:53 history edited mattdm CC BY-SA 3.0
added 28 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Mar 5, 2012 at 0:52 comment added mattdm Posting a sample picture would help.
Mar 5, 2012 at 0:39 comment added Joanne C Given those settings, I'm inclined to think that the camera isn't the problem. You may want to look to your technique instead and see some of the related answers the site is suggesting.
Mar 4, 2012 at 23:58 history asked SIVAD OME CC BY-SA 3.0