Timeline for What are the merits of a wide-gamut display in post-processing for web?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2012 at 13:15 | vote | accept | Imre | ||
| Feb 14, 2012 at 7:03 | comment | added | jrista | My "recommendation" would be to get something that supports at least 98% of AdobeRGB. However, my personal recommendation, and whether such a screen is "necessary" for the kind of work you mentioned you need it for, are different things. ;) A wide gamut display is NOT necessary if all you ever do is publish sRGB versions of your work online. I would still recommend that you pick up a decent LED display capable of 98% AdobeRGB (of which there should be quite a few for moderately expensive prices)...you never know if someday you want to start printing, or at least proofing for print. | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 6:20 | comment | added | Imre | @jrista Truth to be told, this question was largely inspired by one of your comments: If you only do sRGB work, a lesser screen might be fine, but I would still recommend something with broader color range. As I read from this answer, you've changed your mind since then (which is completely okay - changing one's mind shows ability to learn). | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 3:58 | comment | added | jrista | Hah! That too! :D | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 0:36 | comment | added | Shizam | And for those who like to be blown away by their own photos when they're lookin' at em :) | |
| Feb 14, 2012 at 0:19 | history | answered | jrista | CC BY-SA 3.0 |