Timeline for Can I get noise reduction in Aperture that even gets close to the quality of Lightroom's?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2012 at 21:49 | vote | accept | Håkon K. Olafsen | ||
| Feb 1, 2012 at 18:04 | comment | added | Kendall Helmstetter Gelner | @jrista: You can work around that by applying noise reduction first (which you should do anyway) and edit that copy; further changes to noise reduction can then have the old edits copied on top of the new image using lift & stamp. | |
| Feb 1, 2012 at 13:52 | comment | added | Jakub Sisak GeoGraphics | Good point @jrista. Only about 1% of all my images get the "NIK" treatment. Out of those most are HDR which are inherently noisier. Lightroom is great for most family photos and snapshots but as for the handfull of images I actually spend some time on in post processing I usually have several copies of in various stages of processing. | |
| S Feb 1, 2012 at 7:07 | history | suggested | Johan Karlsson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed some spelling errors
|
| Feb 1, 2012 at 6:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 1, 2012 at 7:07 | |||||
| Feb 1, 2012 at 1:09 | comment | added | jrista | It should be noted that Lightroom's noise reduction can be adjusted in non-linear fashion at any time without affecting any other adjustments, where as using a plugin like NIK Dfine requires creating a copy of the image with permanent noise reduction in place. While Lightroom's (which is really superb in and of itself) may not be quite as good...it has the added non-linearity benefit, which is quite valuable in and of itself. | |
| Jan 31, 2012 at 22:43 | history | edited | Jakub Sisak GeoGraphics | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 31, 2012 at 21:08 | history | answered | Jakub Sisak GeoGraphics | CC BY-SA 3.0 |